How to convert your data to LOGFAS

In response to the digital transformation and complexity of military logistics, the large number and diversity of its members, and to offer a standardized solution to the members, NATO developed the LOGFAS suite of operation enablement tools (click here to discover what is LOGFAS). LOGFAS supports complex military operations, from their planning to execution and sustainment, managing equipment, missions, and personal data in a standardized, independent, and nation-agnostic fashion.

Unified view of data: the LOGFAS data format

Most nations use their own data in their national systems to plan and execute logistics operations and manage sustainment of their forces. NATO developed a standardized system implemented within LOGFAS to support multinational operations. It allows NATO to provide members and partner nations unified and shared views of operations in a way that is understood and meaningful to all parties.

Taking advantage of this standardized system requires each nation to build and maintain processes and reference data to support consistent bi-directional flows of data between national systems and LOGFAS.

These requirements are even more crucial to and complex within nations with larger military offerings to multinational operations.

Building and maintaining the reference datasets is key to this standardization effort: reference dataset contains equivalence tables between national data and NATO ones. These reference datasets are used to translate national data into a LOGFAS format. Reference datasets traditionally include, but are not limited to details about organization, equipment, weapon systems, consumables, personnel, and geographic locations.

Extract and convert reference data from your national systems

At Nexus, we developed and have implemented the following integration workflow to help you extract and reference data from your national systems to feed LOGFAS:

  • Identify national systems: we help you identify existing national systems containing your existing reference datasets.
  • Analyze reference datasets: once located, these datasets are analyzed by our team of experts to evaluate their quality and consistency.
  • Associate NATO LOGFAS identifiers to your reference data: , when applicable, we build and deliver your national LOGFAS reference databases (and LOGFAS identifier assignment guidelines to help your organization implement best practices and increase its LOGFAS-readiness.
  • Extract and convert data: we understand how to pull data from the system and when applicable, we automate the generation of LOGFAS data.

Your reference data in LOGFAS: a key for interoperability

Once you have extracted and converted reference data from different systems, you now have access to a unified and consistent view in LOGFAS with all of your organization, equipment, weapon systems, consumables, personal, geographic locations, and other critical assets. With your reference data integrated in LOGFAS, you can now build high-fidelity and detailed deployment plans (DDP), with unit movements, their manifest and schedule.

Besides, when you prepare your data for LOGFAS, you are ready to support your allies and partners in your joint and multinational operations by providing accurate, consistent, and high-quality data.

When used in conjunction with JEDI MNLOGCOP, military leaders now have easily accessible high-quality data for sustainment planning and decision support, while also reducing staff’s workload. JEDI MNLOGCOP was used during the Joint Warfighting Assessment 21 to enhance multi-national interoperability.

What are the LOGFAS training options?

Learning LOGFAS from your Home Station or your Home Office?

As the world slowly recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic and the way it has changed our lives, some changes are meant to persist. Among other things, 2020 will be remembered as the year during which working and interacting with others changed. This major shift has required organizations to develop and adapt to new communication strategies and tools (e.g., videoconference platforms) to continue to perform their duties and support services they offer, remotely.

This forced us to rethink our LOGFAS training program and besides our Mobile Training Teams (MTT), to develop the Nexus Remote Learning Capability (RLC) for LOGFAS, offering our customers more flexibility and less risk in planning and executing training events.

What are my LOGFAS training options?

Remote Learning Capability for LOGFAS

With new work environments and constraints, the Nexus RLC comes with two options: self-paced learning and live remote training.

The self-paced learning, offered through an e-learning platform, lets you enjoy video-based LOGFAS classes at your own pace and provides an ideal and flexible solution to busy participants who cannot always attend continuous days of training. It also is ideal for low-volume training, where filling an entire class for an MTT is impractical. This option comes with online quizzes and exercises to validate your newly acquired knowledge and a certificate of completion at the end of the course.

LOGFAS self-paced learning offered through an e-learning platform

The live remote training is a more traditional option that provides interactive courses with our instructors in live, remote sessions, using a videoconference platform of your choice. The live remote training also gives you access to live feedback from the instructors. This format is an ideal solution for small to large groups but can be constrained by the availability of our instructors.

LOGFAS live remote training at Fort Carson, CO

Mobile Training Teams

The Mobile Training Teams are still available and represent the best choice for groups up to about 25 students in the same physical location. This format allows you to host the training sessions at a facility of your choice, to meet your logistics (we support training worldwide) and security requirements (our training staff holds NATO clearances). This option, however, may be constrained by instructor availability and international travel restrictions.

LOGFAS training summary table

Mobile Training Team Remote Learning Capability
Self-paced learning Live remote training
Internet access Not required Required Required
Feedback Live Email Live
On-demand access No Yes No
Course availability All standard and
tailored courses
Currently limited All standard and
tailored courses

For more information or questions about our options, availability, or pricing please contact us directly.

Demystifying Machine Learning – Part II: Decision vs. Insight in Logistics

This is the second article in a series on Demystifying Machine Learning. If you have not read the first article yet, you can check it out here: Demystifying Machine Learning.

Reviewing Decision vs. Insight in Machine Learning

In our first article, we outlined the three main types of machine learning (supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning) and identified what outputs could be expected from each. If you seek assistance or automation in making a decision that has a correct or incorrect answer, use a supervised machine learning model to aid in selecting the correct answer to new problems based on a training model using similar, past problems. If instead, you are searching for unknown insights in the existing data/situation then you should turn to an unsupervised machine learning model to help you discover previously un-examined patterns and anomalies.

Machine Learning Applications for Logistics Operations

In recent years, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have been applied to a varied number of problems and industries ranging from health to entertainment to banking. One of the fields that stands to benefit significantly from the application of machine learning is logistics operations.

For large commercial organizations, governments, and militaries, the movement of people, products, and equipment is complex. Assuring items arrive in the correct location, at the correct time, in the correct quantities, is challenging even at a small scale. Some organizations, such as shipping and delivery companies, have utilized emerging technologies to conquer the complexities of these activities and can reliably and consistently manage a massive network of products and transportation equipment. Other organizations have had less success in trying to overcome these challenges.

Machine learning and AI can be used to predict transportation times, alert of equipment breakdown risk, or quantify the impact of changing weather on resource consumption rates, to name a few examples. This information can be the key to successful logistics operations activities. In the next sections, we will review some logistics scenarios where decision or insight support is achieved using ML techniques to improve the outcomes of logistics operations. These scenarios will focus on consumables management.

Logistics Use Case 1: Consumption Rate Prediction

Consumables, no matter their class (e.g., food, water, fuel, or ammunition), are a major factor in the success and complexity of the planning, execution, and sustainment of a mission. While an excess of consumables can complexify planning, transportation, and storage, a shortage can derail execution and jeopardize a mission and the engaged personnel. Finding the right balance between what is needed and what is manageable is key.

Supervised learning techniques applied to historical data from missions of a similar nature (e.g., same geographical operational area, weather conditions, objectives, etc.), can help decision makers to better predict future consumption and plan accordingly. For instance, historical water consumption data can be analyzed to identify trends and generate predictive formulas. These formulas can be applied to forecast data by extrapolating future consumption and support leaders in making educated decisions about resource requirements and sustainment operations when planning for future events.

Logistics Use Case 2: Uncovering Insights

While predicting consumption rates is a direct way of optimizing consumables management, uncovering insights about those rates is just as important. This can be achieved using supervised or unsupervised learning methods, both methods providing different types of insight.

On one hand, supervised learning can be used to analyze historical data to help understand the correlation between different independent variables (e.g., environmental factors) and an associated dependent variable (e.g., water consumption rates). For instance, when looking at past water consumption, this type of analysis can be used to identify and rank environmental factors (e.g., temperature, humidity, elevation) by the size of their impact on the resulting water consumption (this measure of impact size on the dependent variable is known as the correlation coefficient).

Although, it is often the case that two independent variables may be strongly related (known as correlation), . Two variables can be strongly correlated to one another, leading to an incorrect belief of causation between the two variables, when the correlation is actually the result of a third, unexamined, variable which is impacting the two examined variables in a process known as confounding. For instance, while ice cream consumption and the number of shark attacks are strongly correlated (i.e., they tend to follow each other), they are both caused by rising temperatures (the confounding variable):

  • high temperatures in the summer cause people to eat more ice cream,
  • those same high temperatures cause people to swim more, exposing them to shark attacks.

On the other hand, unsupervised learning can analyze datasets to identify clusters of similarities (i.e., data records following similar patterns), to support complex environments in which the amount of data variables cannot be processed by the naked eye. In a simple scenario with two variables (e.g., temperature and water consumption), data records can be easily plotted on a 2D chart that can be interpreted by the naked eye. In more complex scenarios, with more numerous variables (e.g., temperature, water consumption, humidity, and elevation), humans cannot represent and interpret the data themselves, and rely on artificial intelligence to provide that analysis.

By identifying similarities, it also becomes possible to identify anomalies, in the form of isolated records. When it comes to consumables, these anomalies are significant findings that could represent over/under consumption of resources, and usually indicate a need for further investigation to understand and identify the root cause (e.g., leaky equipment, faulty sensors, degrading performance).

Machine Learning Challenges

These analytical tools (ML and AI) and their associated benefits come with challenges that need to be properly understood to take full advantage of them:

  • A right balance between “enough” and “too much” needs to be struck when it comes to data volume. A dataset on the smaller end can be misrepresentative of the field situation by missing out on independent variables or low-frequency events. Larger datasets can be polluted with irrelevant variables or outdated data, diluting relevant data, and overwhelming the learning algorithms with noise that leads to inaccurate or less accurate outcomes.
  • The ML outputs, be it quantitative values or clusters, can be difficult to translate into actionable information. As discussed in the correlation vs causation section, results must be contextualized before deriving informed courses of action. This contextualization requires subject matter experts to interpret the environment captured by the different data variables to properly identify and distinguish causations from correlations.


In this article we reviewed the difference between decision and insight solutions generated by machine learning models and the importance of knowing which approach is appropriate for your scenario. We examined how machine learning can be applied to problems in logistics and consumable management, and how it can provide valuable information to greatly improve the efficiency and success of logistics activities. Lastly, we examined some key challenges that must be understood when utilizing machine learning solutions. In our next and last article in this series, we will discuss deep learning and look at how multiple types of machine learning models can be combined to form neural networks.

Nexus and its partner Black & Rossi are actively implementing AI and ML within the JEDI-X platform to enhance decision support and automation. Our experts can help you learn more about ML, the opportunities within your organization, and how to overcome associated challenges. Contact us now to speak with one of our experts.

Demystifying Machine Learning

What is Machine Learning?

Despite a growing popularity and importance over the past decade, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) can be intimidating concepts to approach because of the vast and complex technical background they rely on and require to be properly implemented. Contrary to popular belief, this technical background is not necessary to understand these concepts, and in this article, we will demystify Machine Learning without diving into any of its mathematical foundations.

AI, a computer science field reported to be initiated in the mid-40s, refers to computerized cognitive behavior (e.g., communication, image processing, and reasoning) and its technical components. One key behavior, which you are experiencing as you read this article, is learning. Learning is about building knowledge, by acquiring and analyzing information, to make better and faster decisions in a predictive manner: the same input should consistently lead to the same output. Machine Learning is about replicating and programming this behavior into artificial agents (e.g., computers, smartphones, IoT devices).

Understanding the different types of learning

Just like us, machines need to learn before they can make decisions. Simply following pre-programmed instructions in the code itself is not learning. Learning happens in a classroom (the machine learning engine), produces a graduate (the machine learning model), and can be achieved in many ways.

The most popular ways to learn are:

  1. By example, with a supervisor, also known as supervised learning. This method requires an external agent (supervisor) to feed annotated/labeled information and decisions to the machine, to identify correlations between these datasets. This type of learning is task-driven: it requires knowledge of the kind of decisions we expect the machine to deliver.
  2. On your own: also known as unsupervised learning. This method relies on the machine ability to detect (complex) patterns and anomalies among (often a significantly large set of) unlabeled data. This type of learning is data-driven: unlike supervised learning, we do not anticipate any output, but plan on the machine to deliver new insights about the data.
  3. Through trial and error: also known as reinforcement learning. This method processes unlabeled data to make decisions that are evaluated by an external agent through a feedback loop that scores these decisions. This score is used by the learner to improve its accuracy over time. This type of learning is error-driven, and it can be used to augment either supervised or unsupervised learning to improve their outputs.

These three types of learning are the most popular and are not restricted to any application domain, but they do not share the same execution model. Supervised learning requires (most of the time) offline training before the machine learning model is ready to be used: this is a traditional student who only learns in the classroom when a supervisor is present. Other forms happen live and incrementally: this is an eternal student who does not require a supervisor and lives in the classroom, constantly discovering new things.

Learning by example

In this section we are going to illustrate ML and walk you through two basic examples. One supervised and one unsupervised.
First, using supervised learning we are going to train an ML model to recognize a particular animal. The first step consists of training the model using the ML engine by describing and labeling what we expect the model to recognize. In the engine, the model is taught to identify a correlation between the input given and the conclusion (i.e., the characteristics from our description and the conclusion that an animal is a dog). Once this training has been completed, we can now apply the ML model on new input data that must be classified. In our example, one input will be classified as a dog, while the other will be identified as “not a dog”, because the model could not draw a conclusion based off the correlation it has learned.

In this second example, we are using unsupervised learning to gain insight about a set of animals. That data is fed directly into an engine in which a model groups animals together based on their similarities it can identify. This approach typically results in anonymous groups (i.e., that are not labelled) of similar items.

Because unsupervised learning models are eternal students, they can quickly adapt and react to new data. Our input dataset is now enriched with an additional instance. Due to its nature, the model can automatically recreate new groups, based on the new data. These groups will be composed based on the engine and model respective configuration. Both results below are valid outputs. In one, the animals are grouped by their species, in the second result they are grouped by the environment they live in.

Understanding your needs: decision vs insight

Because learning techniques do not yield the same results, it is important to properly define your objectives and needs before picking one. Task-driven supervised learning is an ideal solution to classification and regression problems, in which you already know the problem you want to solve and expect the machine to make decisions for you. Data-driven unsupervised learning is an ideal solution to clustering and association problems, in which you want to explore and learn more about your datasets and expect the machine to give you new insights about your environment.


In this article we have introduced machine learning as the science of artificially replicating one of our most important cognitive behaviors: learning. We then discussed and illustrated its most popular forms: supervised and task-driven, unsupervised and data-driven, and through reinforcement. We ended by highlighting the importance of understanding your needs, before choosing a learning method. In our next article, we will discuss what decision vs. insight means when it comes to logistics.

Nexus is actively implementing AI and ML within our JEDI-X platform to enhance decision support and automation, taking advantage of its semantically rich data.

What is a Logistics COP

Command and Control relies on high-quality logistics and operation data for critical decision making

Military leaders and their staff must make decisions to effectively command and control the diverse capabilities of a joint or multinational force in complex environments. The US Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms defines Command and Control (C2) as:

The exercise of authority and direction by a properly designated commander over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of the mission.

During the exercise of this authority and direction, commanders need to make timely and informed decisions. Ultimately, the quality of the decisions strongly depends on the quality of the information that the commander receives as input (situational awareness). To fulfill this mission, information must be current, accurate and contextual. This is possible by enabling data interoperability and workflows from multiple source data systems.

Additionally, commanders need advanced tools to interpret that data and provide situational awareness. These analytics tools, often in the form of maps and dashboards, have intuitive and configurable user interface that can be tailored to the function and staff it supports. These tools are often referred to as Common Operational Picture or COPs.

COP, Logistics COP, RLF

What is a COP?

In Joint Publication 3-0, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff define a Common Operational Picture (COP) as

a single identical display of relevant information shared by more than one command that facilitates collaborative planning and assists all echelons to achieve situational awareness.

This situational awareness is key to making effective decisions despite the fog and friction of operations.

What is a Logistics COP?

A Logistics COP (LCOP or LOG COP), also known as a Recognized Logistics Picture (RLP), is a tool for situational awareness and decision support, specifically for use by logistics personnel. RLP deliver multiple views of equipment, personnel, and supply readiness in greater detail than what is in a Commander’s COP. In an operational context, the RLP allows the logistics staff to optimize available logistics resources in the Joint Operations Area (JOA) and advise or influence the operational commander through the presentation of compelling evidence supported by accurate and timely data.

In an enterprise context, an RLP can be tailored to provide similar visual representations of information to support decisions related to distribution networks, procurements, or positioning of supplies and equipment to support ongoing or emerging operations. Data interoperability is relevant here also, as equipment and materials are typically managed in different information systems based upon which organization manages them, whether they are held in wholesale or retail inventory, or the type of asset (e.g., vehicles, munitions, fuels).

What is an RLF?

A Recognized Logistics Forecast (RLF) does not focus on the current situation but on the future. An RLF uses the current logistic situation (RLP), expected in/out-flows of the JOA, predicted effects of consumption over a defined timeframe, and other related factors to forecast the future logistics situation and resources availability and needs. Using advanced techniques, such as Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), the RLF learns from the past and gives military leaders increasingly accurate predictions of the future situation. An RLF should also be capable of determining the logistics supportability and risks related to multiple operational or enterprise Courses of Action (CoA) to enable logisticians to identify impacts, even second and third order effects from decisions before they are enacted.

These tools are graphically focused products, usually comprised of a mix of geographical and chart-based information, with the ability to interrogate the underlying data when required. They rely on the automated collection, curation, and analysis of data to respond to proposed Maneuver or Logistics COA.

Logistics COP
Logistics COP for Multinational Logistics

RLP for Multinational Logistics

The JEDI Multinational Logistics Common Operational Picture (MNLOGCOP) is designed to:

  • leverage and synchronize data from multiple operational systems
  • support multinational data and exercises
  • natively compatible with NATO LOGFAS data
  • be fully customizable to a user, nation, commodity, operation, or timeframe
  • compute metrics or train ML/AI models to provide advanced logistics forecasts

The JEDI MNLOGCOP is a customizable display of relevant information from one or more Command and Nation. Built to natively support LOGFAS, it facilitates collaborative planning to achieve situational awareness, even in multinational environments.

The JEDI MNLOGCOP leverages JEDI-X to integrate and consume data from multiple disparate sources to support even the most complex scenarios. JEDI-X provides structured data to COPs, RLP or to enable an RLF through application of the ML/AI tools that are best suited for the context of the decisions.

Nexus LCM is working with the US Army to implement the JEDI MNLOGCOP capability as an RLP in the Joint Warfighting Assessment series as an enabler for LOGFAS to support embedded multinational Brigades in US Army Divisions

Why interoperability matters

Definitions of interoperability

In Joint Publication 6, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) defines interoperability as

the condition achieved among communications-electronics systems or items of communications-electronics equipment when information or services can be exchanged directly and satisfactorily between them and/or their users.

In NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions, NATO defines interoperability as

the ability of Alliance forces and, when appropriate, forces of Partner and other nations to train, exercise and operate effectively together in the execution of assigned missions and tasks.


What is interoperability?

We define interoperability as the mean of delivering tactical, strategic, and operational data, where and when it matters, helping military leaders and their staff to make critical decisions.


Why does it matter?

Large military organizations suffer from specialization. Commands use jargon, processes, and information systems that are tailored to support their specific functional domains (e.g., research, acquisition, operations, sustainment, and resource management). Non-standardized data models, terminology, reporting formats, siloed networks, and unique processes limit the sharing and reuse of data across domains within the Services, Joint commands, industry, and Multinational partners. This lack of access to accurate and relevant data has significant consequences on military organizations and their decisions and actions:

  • It limits the visibility of available Joint, industry, and Multinational resources
  • It reduces the effectiveness of current planning or decision support tools
  • It hinders the reach for advanced analytics such as Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence


Nexus Joint Enterprise Data Interoperability (JEDI-X)

According to the CJCS in Joint Publication 3-16,

interoperability greatly enhances multinational operations through the ability to operate in the execution of assigned tasks. Nations whose forces are interoperable across materiel and nonmateriel capabilities can operate together effectively in numerous ways.

Interoperability is the core of Joint and Multinational Operations. The ability to shoot, move, communicate, protect, and sustain as a singular unit with partners improves the effectiveness of military organizations across the spectrum of operations. Using common processes, platforms and information systems is the highest level of interoperability, but this can be understandably difficult to achieve in complex Joint and Multinational operations. Being able to use common data for planning and decisions, with the ability to transact common resources while operating in one’s national or service systems and processes is a viable alternative when commonality is not possible.

Joint Enterprise Data Interoperability (JEDI-X) enables interoperability and has already been adopted by the US Army. By integrating processes and systems, JEDI-X enables systems to access and share data in a controlled environment, eliminating inefficient, error-prone, and redundant data manipulations across organizations. JEDI-X improves the velocity and quality of available data to technicians, planners, decision makers, and decision support tools by providing contextually accurate data for re-use across information systems and organizational boundaries.

Click on the link to see on the website how Steadfast Cobalt 18 introduced the 16th Sustainment Brigade to the Joint Enterprise Data Interoperability in the US Army.

What is LOGFAS

What is LOGFAS?

Logistics Functional Area Services (LOGFAS) is the suite of tools supporting NATO logistics processes for strategic movement and transportation, multinational deployment planning and execution, in-theatre movement scheduling, and sustainment planning. It is developed, maintained and supported by the Service Support and Business Application of NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCIA).

Why is LOGFAS important?

NATO LOGFAS is the cornerstone of multinational and joint interoperability. It integrates and manages logistics information at the enterprise level and across NATO Allies and Partners. It offers data management and analytics capabilities through modules that support planning and execution of logistics operations.

LOGFAS benefits are multifold:

  1. Enables multinational collaboration with NATO Allies and Partners in the planning and execution of Multinational logistics operations,
  2. Enables joint collaboration within the joint logistics enterprise,
  3. Works in degraded mode when connectivity is not available during operations,
  4. Access to a Common Operational Picture with different capabilities available in one click. For example: simulate the movement planning in LOGFAS, or access real-time and historical dashboard and map with JEDI MNLOGCOP.

How LOGFAS supports the military logistics process

LOGFAS Process
LOGAS logistics processes

The main logistics process phases as captured in LOGFAS are described below:

  1. Force Profile and Holdings definition
    • Forces definition (including their attributes and organization)
    • Items definition (including their attributes and categories)
    • Force holdings definition
  2. Sustainment planning
    • Parameters configuration
    • Requirements simulation and prediction
  3. Deployment planning
    • Detailed Deployment Plan definition
    • Movements & Assets configuration
    • Planned cargo manifest definition
  4. Deployment execution
    • Execution mission times visualization
    • Actual cargo manifest retrieval
    • Movements tracking
  5. Logistics reporting
    • Operational level logistics assessment
    • Current state of items monitoring

What are the LOGFAS modules?

LOGFAS Process
The modules

Geographical Manager (GEOMAN)
GEOMAN is used to manage the maps, locations, and networks. GEOMAN locations include air and sea ports. The networks / routes include air, inland waterways, pipelines, rail, road, and sea. Additional infrastructure information such as runways and berths can also be included.

LOGFAS Data Management (LDM)
LDM is used for all data management and data reporting. This includes information about Forces, Items, Assets, and their relationships with one another.

Allied Deployment and Movement System (ADAMS)
ADAMS supports:

  • the planning and monitoring of strategic deployments within the desired area of responsibility
  • movement coordination and deconfliction
  • force and asset assignments and scheduling

Coalition Reception Staging Onward Movement (CORSOM)
Like ADAMS, CORSOM is used to improve reception, staging, and onward movement (RSOM) operations during deployments. CORSOM also includes planning, analysis and deconfliction activities as well as visibility and monitoring of RSOM activities during the deployment.

Effective Visible Execution (EVE)
EVE supports the deployment execution and provides visibility of movement and transportation of assets. EVE also supports the review, prioritization and coordination of movement and transportation.

Supply Distribution Model (SDM)
SDM is a decision-support tool used to test operation resupply and sustainment policies for different scenarios.

Sustainment Planning Model (SPM)
SPM handles Operation Sustainment Planning and packaging, Strategic Stockpile Planning for commodities, and Sustainability Analysis for forces.

How is a LOGFAS Training organized?

Our training is tailored to your needs, starting with a generic overview followed by additional module training of your choice. All training sessions are live and given by our qualified instructors, in-person or virtually through our online and secure e-learning center.

LOGFAS Training
Nexus LCM LOGFAS training agenda example

How to get the user guide and the tools?

Any NATO member can obtain LOGFAS through their appropriate channels.

Do you need help?

Check our LOGFAS Training and Consulting page.

JEDI-X DoD White Paper

The CJCS National Military Strategy identifies the need for interoperability in the Dynamic Force Employment (DFE). It states that

Building a strong, agile, and resilient force requires better interoperability and enhancing the combat lethality and survivability of our allies and partners.

In the US Army, Army Futures Command leads a continuous transformation of Army modernization in order to provide future warfighters with the concepts, capabilities and organizational structures they need to dominate a future battlefield. Joint Enterprise Data Interoperability (JEDI-X) is a capability initially developed by the US Joint Staff to ensure data interoperability that will enable DoD to improve lethality and enable similar logistics data interoperability in the Joint and Coalition space, while supporting the concept of DFE.

Lack of interoperability

DoD, like all large organizations suffers from specialization. Commands use jargon, processes and information systems that are tailored to support their specific functional domains such as research, acquisition, operations, sustainment, and resource management. Non-standardized data models, terminology, reporting formats, and siloed networks limit the sharing and reuse of data by other domains within the Services, Joint commands, industry and Multinational partners performing services for the DoD, or similar roles. This lack of access to accurate, relevant data limits the visibility of available Joint, industry and Multinational resources, the effectiveness of current planning or decision support tools, and hinders the reach for advanced analytics such as Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.

Data Interoperability using JEDI-X

Interoperability is the core of Joint and Multinational Operations. The ability to shoot, move, communicate, protect and sustain as a singular unit with partners improves the effectiveness of the DoD across the spectrum of operations. Using common processes, platforms and information systems is the highest level of interoperability. Being able to use common data for planning and decisions, with the ability to transact common resources while operating in national or service systems is a viable alternative when commonality is not possible. Joint Enterprise Data Interoperability (JEDI-X) enables both for the US Army today.

JEDI-X uses a systems engineering approach to identify and map data across current organizational and functional boundaries to unlock it with the necessary context for re-use. It uses non-proprietary information models to ascribe context in data mappings for ease of maintenance and extensibility of data from source to a myriad of target uses. JEDI-X also provides mediation and translation services across these information systems to support transactions, reporting, and visualization of data across systems that otherwise are isolated and opaque.

US Army JEDI-X Implementations

JEDI-X enables the Army and US European Command to re-use US force deployment data from various systems to populate US data in the NATO Logistics Functional Area Services (LOGFAS) suite of tools for coordinating deployment and sustainment of the combined forces. JEDI-X also re-uses LOGFAS data within a Recognized Logistics Picture (RLP) of the combined force, enabling cross-servicing of logistics resources and sustainment planning. Nexus LCM is working with US Army Europe and HQ, Army G4 to:

  1. Implement the JEDI MNLOGCOP capability as an RLP in the Joint Warfighting Assessment series as an enabler for LOGFAS to support embedded multinational Brigades in US Army Divisions;
  2. Automate feeds of US Army in-theater movement requests to Multinational Movement Coordination Capabilities, while retaining linkages to the Army Resource Management system of record for payment;
  3. Enable data feeds from US Transportation Command and theater movements for an integrated view of movements of units and supplies during deployment and sustainment operations to improve coordination of infrastructure, material handling and transportation assets, ensuring prioritization and efficient initial operational capabilities to the Commander;
  4. Use JEDI-X to integrate an Artificial Intelligence-enabled transportation planning and resourcing tool into NATO operations;
  5. Continue assessment for a JEDI-X enabled capability for operational units to have visibility and transact multinational supplies and order digital/additive manufactured parts, all without leaving GCSS-Army.


By simply unlocking and linking existing data for re-use in other processes and systems, JEDI-X can eliminate inefficient searching, cleansing and re-entry of data common in today’s DoD. It can improve the velocity and quality of available data to planners, decision makers, advanced decision support tools of choice and technicians in support of their roles through providing contextually accurate data for re-use across information system and organizational boundaries.